Burmah steamship co ltd v irc 1931 16 tc 67
WebThe appellants are the Commissioners of Inland Revenue. The respondent is the Burmah Oil Co. Ltd. (‘Burmah’). Burmah was assessed to corporation tax for its accounting period ended 31st December 1972 in a sum of over £3 million. WebMar 15, 2024 · The Calcutta and Burmah Steam Navigation Company was formally registered on 29 September 1856. The East India Company had opened the door to Mackinnon, Mackenzie & Co in 1855, when they invited tenders for a regular mail steamship route between Calcutta and Rangoon. The partners were successful in their …
Burmah steamship co ltd v irc 1931 16 tc 67
Did you know?
Webthe Irrawaddy Flotilla Co. Ltd Gartmore, Stirlingshire, FK8 3RJ S c o t l a n d Tel 01877 382 998 Fax 01877 382 778 ... The Konbaung Dynasty 16, King Bodawhpaya 18, First and Second Anglo Burmese Wars 19, The Irrawaddy ... for echo sounders have proved a far less eff e c t i v e technique for gauging the river’s depth than the old method of ... WebMidwest Energy
WebRelied Upon :- Commissioner of Income-tax Excess Pro-fite tax, Bombay City v. Shamsher Printing Works, AIR 1954 Bom 137 (A) Distinguished on facts:- Burmah Steamship Co. … WebThe Alliance and Dublin Consumers’ Gas Co v McWilliams 1 ITC 199, [1928] IR 1, 1 LTR 201. Burmah Steamship Co Ltd v CIR [1931] SC 156, [1931] SLT 116, 16 TC 67. …
WebHarry Ferguson Motors Ltd v IRC [1951] Company received payments from the managing directors patent payments. Held to have been trading receipts. Higgs v Olivier [1953] ... Burmah Steamship v IRC [1931] Compensation paid to ship owner for repairs taking longer than was expected. Held that these were trading receipts as they replaced the income ... WebIn the case of Burmah Steam Ship Co Ltd v CIR [1930] 16TC67 the owners contracted for repairs to a second-hand vessel. The ship repairer exceeded the agreed time for the …
WebReferring to Burmah Steamship Company Limited v IRC 1931 SC 156, 16 TC 67 and ITC 1435 50 SATC 117. 97 Clegg, D. does however note that a pattern of receiving various inducement payments on different occasions may affect the credibility of the lessee’s claim that they were not sought after.
WebGlenboig Union Fireclay Co Ltd v IRC (1922); Burmah Steamship Co v IRC (1930) • Difficulties arise where the compensation is for unliquidated damages and the capital and ... Coke Co Pty Ltd v FC of T 77 ATC 4255. o The person who earns the income is the relevant person who pays the tax on it. 5 lincoln water bill loginWebReferring to Burmah Steamship Company Limited v IRC 1931 SC 156, 16 TC 67 and ITC 1435 50 SATC 117. 97 Clegg, D. does however note that a pattern of receiving various … hotel thermas de piratubaWeb8. Mr. Grady for the Revenue cited a number of authorities including Burmah Steamship Co. Ltd. v. IRC 16 TC 67 and London and Thames Haven Oil Wharves Ltd. v. Attwooll … lincoln water and waste systemWebThe City of Fawn Creek is located in the State of Kansas. Find directions to Fawn Creek, browse local businesses, landmarks, get current traffic estimates, road conditions, and … lincoln water commission riWebIn the case of Burmah Steam Ship Co Ltd v CIR [1930] 16TC67 the owners contracted for repairs to a second-hand vessel. The ship repairer exceeded the agreed time for the overhaul and damages were ... lincoln water commission lincoln riWebSee also Burmah Steam Ship Co Ltd v IRC (1931) 16 TC 67 and London & Thames Haven Oil Wharves Ltd v Attwooll [1967] 2 All ER 124,134. 16. The Courts have … lincoln water commission rhode islandWeb1931: NO. 788.-COURT OF SESSION, SCOTLAND (FIRST DIVISION).-(1) BURMAH STEAM SHIP COMPANY. ... Sien onder andere Burmah Steamship Co Ltd v Inland … lincoln water department lincoln al